The 25th Amendment can be applied retroactively, you know.
Trump DID say the 25th Amendment was no threat to him…but it WOULD end up haunting Joe Biden.
If a company President is demented, and his staff is revealed to have been hiding this while they ran the company themselves for their own benefit using him as a figurehead…legally how do any of the ACTIONS taken by the staff survive a legal challenge in court?
Remember: it’s already in **the official federal record from a special council named Robert Hur** that Joe Biden is suffering from dementia and Hur knew that almost 2 years ago when he interviewed Biden over the classified documents found at his house.
It’s all in Hur’s very official final report.
How do I know that?
I READ IT.
Ain’t life grand?
Why was Schiff so UNBELIEVABLY PISSED that Hur includes COMMENTS ABOUT JOE BIDEN’S OBVIOUSLY DIMINISHED MENTAL CAPACITY in his official federal DOJ final report, entering that into the federal record BEFORE any of these pardons were issued?
Think real hard about that.
No knee-jerk emotional responses.
What did Hur open the door to?
What kind orchestrated RICO crime would it be to use deceptive strategies and practices to pretend that a mentally diminished executive is doing a job he’s no longer able to do?
And this criminal conspiracy manages to operate successfully for several years before it’s exposed?
And it turns certain persons involved in this criminal cover up were enriching/benefiting themselves while keeping the conspiracy going?
In the fallout and aftermath of that criminal conspiracy being exposed, acknowledged, and admitted to, are legal challenges to any official actions undertaken by the criminals in question very strong, or would you consider such challenges to be extremely weak?
What do you think?
Tell me in the comments!
Mike