Mike
Duitsland
- Onderwerp starter fatsnotbad
- Startdatum
Mike
Dilly Hussain and his Salafist/HT associates are just the Salafist equivalent of CNN: pretending to be 'independent' journalists whilst actually being embedded Salafist proxies.
They have caused significant harm to the Muslim community. Their connections and likely funding from Salafist groups which suggests they are aligned with Zionist agendas, effectively making them agents of the Zionists.
Whenever major issues affect Muslims, Dilly Hussain and his Salafist Dawah associates are trotted out by Zionist media as representatives of Muslims. Their goal is to portray Muslims in a bad light, and Dilly and his crew succeed in that objective. While one might think this behavior is due to incompetence, the truth is that they are Zionists, who do everything in their power to fuel the Islamophobia industry.
The spread of Saudi-backed Salafism in the West was heavily promoted by Zionists and their Salafist financiers. These individuals breed extremism and then blame ordinary Muslims for it. The vast majority of acts of extremism committed by Muslims are carried out by members of the Salafist extremist sect. Yet, it is ordinary Muslims who are forced to answer for these actions.
Dilly Hussain himself is of low intellectual capacity, as evidenced by him being repeatedly destroyed by Piers Morgan. I was invited to appear on Piers Morgan’s show multiple times, though on less important topics. On one occasion, I declined, because I didn’t want to defend the doctor from the extremist HT sect. I believe in free speech but didn’t want to be left defending an extremist group.
However, when it comes to critical issues like the events of October 7, the media gives a platform to Salafists like Dilly, ensuring they fail and make Muslims look bad. Zionists media outlets love to give him this platform because it serves their agenda.
The posts about Taleb, the extremist responsible for the attack from Germany, were originally from me. I broke the story and made it public. Dilly’s feed has literally taken my posts but I don’t seek credit; the most important thing is getting the news out. Meanwhile, Dilly and his Dawah associates were asleep when these events were being relayed on social media. The aim is to allow ordinary Muslims to deal with major blowback’s like this, which generally come from people who follow his ideology.
I built my platform on my own, without Salafi or Zionist funding. I even walked away from a major contract to stand with the Palestinians on October 7, without hesitation. Dilly, on the other hand, did not have to make any sacrifices—he represents his group’s interests which align with Zionists.
I built my platform without funding or financing and hosted the largest Twitter spaces before October 7, doing so on my own. If anything, I sacrificed my regular base to stand with the Palestinians. In terms of my following, I had accumulated a larger audience than Dilly before October 7, despite Salafi groups promoting each other to ensure that no non-Salafi can make an impact on the discourse. My Twitter spaces covered a wide range of political issues, while Dilly, whose sole focus is propagating Salafism, does not engage with such diverse topics. This was further demonstrated in their failures in local politics, where they ended up splitting the vote in certain areas.
If Dilly weren’t a Salafi or supported by their funding, he wouldn’t even have a platform. He has zero skills or credentials. But Zionists enjoy platforming figures like him, as it helps tarnish the image of Muslims.
Dilly’s has been on trips to Syria and Afghanistan, countries that reflect the ideology of ISIS and al-Qaeda, both of which are offshoots of his Salafi/HT beliefs. 1/2
It’s ironic that Dilly criticizes my journalism about Andrew Tate, considering he and his Dawah associates were gagging for an interview with Tate. I built my presence on social media based on merit, without Salafi or Zionist funding. I successfully debunked Zionist propaganda, while Dilly role was his failures on Zionist media.
In one particularly damaging appearance, Dilly was completely destroyed during a discussion about teaching LGBTQ topics in schools. His defeat played a key role in further demonizing Muslims and portraying them as backward. He had no response when Piers Morgan told him to "go back to Islamabad." If I were Dilly, I would have never shown my face again.
Zionist media will continue to use figures like Dilly because their role is to make Muslims look bad. For two decades, they have successfully helped advance the Zionist agenda of demonizing Muslims.
On the other hand we have played a key role in waking up the west to the truth about Zionism and its connection to the Islamophobia industry.
But now, as we are dominating both politics and social media, they are facing a mental crisis. Welcome to the new normal, where people are learning that Islam is a peaceful religion, while Dilly and his associates' are losing it as their extreme version of Islam is being left behind. 2/2
Mike
They have caused significant harm to the Muslim community. Their connections and likely funding from Salafist groups which suggests they are aligned with Zionist agendas, effectively making them agents of the Zionists.
Whenever major issues affect Muslims, Dilly Hussain and his Salafist Dawah associates are trotted out by Zionist media as representatives of Muslims. Their goal is to portray Muslims in a bad light, and Dilly and his crew succeed in that objective. While one might think this behavior is due to incompetence, the truth is that they are Zionists, who do everything in their power to fuel the Islamophobia industry.
The spread of Saudi-backed Salafism in the West was heavily promoted by Zionists and their Salafist financiers. These individuals breed extremism and then blame ordinary Muslims for it. The vast majority of acts of extremism committed by Muslims are carried out by members of the Salafist extremist sect. Yet, it is ordinary Muslims who are forced to answer for these actions.
Dilly Hussain himself is of low intellectual capacity, as evidenced by him being repeatedly destroyed by Piers Morgan. I was invited to appear on Piers Morgan’s show multiple times, though on less important topics. On one occasion, I declined, because I didn’t want to defend the doctor from the extremist HT sect. I believe in free speech but didn’t want to be left defending an extremist group.
However, when it comes to critical issues like the events of October 7, the media gives a platform to Salafists like Dilly, ensuring they fail and make Muslims look bad. Zionists media outlets love to give him this platform because it serves their agenda.
The posts about Taleb, the extremist responsible for the attack from Germany, were originally from me. I broke the story and made it public. Dilly’s feed has literally taken my posts but I don’t seek credit; the most important thing is getting the news out. Meanwhile, Dilly and his Dawah associates were asleep when these events were being relayed on social media. The aim is to allow ordinary Muslims to deal with major blowback’s like this, which generally come from people who follow his ideology.
I built my platform on my own, without Salafi or Zionist funding. I even walked away from a major contract to stand with the Palestinians on October 7, without hesitation. Dilly, on the other hand, did not have to make any sacrifices—he represents his group’s interests which align with Zionists.
I built my platform without funding or financing and hosted the largest Twitter spaces before October 7, doing so on my own. If anything, I sacrificed my regular base to stand with the Palestinians. In terms of my following, I had accumulated a larger audience than Dilly before October 7, despite Salafi groups promoting each other to ensure that no non-Salafi can make an impact on the discourse. My Twitter spaces covered a wide range of political issues, while Dilly, whose sole focus is propagating Salafism, does not engage with such diverse topics. This was further demonstrated in their failures in local politics, where they ended up splitting the vote in certain areas.
If Dilly weren’t a Salafi or supported by their funding, he wouldn’t even have a platform. He has zero skills or credentials. But Zionists enjoy platforming figures like him, as it helps tarnish the image of Muslims.
Dilly’s has been on trips to Syria and Afghanistan, countries that reflect the ideology of ISIS and al-Qaeda, both of which are offshoots of his Salafi/HT beliefs. 1/2
It’s ironic that Dilly criticizes my journalism about Andrew Tate, considering he and his Dawah associates were gagging for an interview with Tate. I built my presence on social media based on merit, without Salafi or Zionist funding. I successfully debunked Zionist propaganda, while Dilly role was his failures on Zionist media.
In one particularly damaging appearance, Dilly was completely destroyed during a discussion about teaching LGBTQ topics in schools. His defeat played a key role in further demonizing Muslims and portraying them as backward. He had no response when Piers Morgan told him to "go back to Islamabad." If I were Dilly, I would have never shown my face again.
Zionist media will continue to use figures like Dilly because their role is to make Muslims look bad. For two decades, they have successfully helped advance the Zionist agenda of demonizing Muslims.
On the other hand we have played a key role in waking up the west to the truth about Zionism and its connection to the Islamophobia industry.
But now, as we are dominating both politics and social media, they are facing a mental crisis. Welcome to the new normal, where people are learning that Islam is a peaceful religion, while Dilly and his associates' are losing it as their extreme version of Islam is being left behind. 2/2
Mike
Mike
Mike
️BREAKING:German authorities admit that they were warned LAST YEAR about the Zionist Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen who did the terrorist attack at Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany.
I added the messages they received from a Saudi girl warning them, they didn’t listen.
Translation of Image:
“Federal Office for Migration and Refugees
#BAMFclarifies
The Federal Office received a tip via its social media channels in late summer of last year regarding the individual allegedly responsible for the attack in Magdeburg. This tip, like all other numerous tips, was taken seriously. As the Federal Office is not an investigative authority, the informant was, as is customary in such cases, directly referred to the responsible authorities.
Please understand that we cannot provide further statements on the specific case.”
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Forum statistieken
