Globalisten & Cultureel Marxisme



Tekst uit deze tweet:

NATURAL INEQUALITY is the elephant in the room for our age. It's simply true that redirecting decision making power AWAY from high IQ people cost nations billions every year. But every major pillar of contemporary politics, from affirmative action to equity policies, does just this.

Countries serious about prosperity, like Singapore, are transparently elitist and reap the rewards. But most of the world is buckling under the intellectual weight of democracy.

Infrastructure is uglier, more expensive, and has a shorter lifespan than before. Culture is reduced to endless & uninventive recycling of old stuff. Politicians will string together whatever convenient lies they need to to keep power.

The fundamental questions, raised by Dostoevsky, are buried under triviality:

"Whom can we now consider our best people? Most important, where shall we find them? Who will take the responsibility for proclaiming them the best, and on what basis?"

Thomas Carlyle wrote that the pleb who does not submit to the higher vision of the aristocrat is as bad as the aristocrat who callously exploits the plebs.

But modern politics is by the plebs, for the plebs, of the plebs.

However...

Politics is a subset of nature, and nature itself is all power, dominance, violence, and hierarchies. The jungle is not banished but remains restless on the edges of civilization.

It will return.

Mike
 
Those reflexively opposed to generalisations shame people with accurate mental models about the world because they struggle with truth and representativeness, and yet their demands for greater specificity are merely superficial and dense because what appears to be a desire for nuance is really nothing more than defensive midwit pettiness missing the forest for the trees.

To the midwit, nobody is allowed to observe trends and codify them into general observations, because their low functioning autism doesn't understand probability or spectrums (pun intended) which is why they believe exceptions disprove rules rather than prove them. Their mental deficiency in reasoning ability then poses as moral righteousness and tries to police others - which is what makes the midwit such an insufferably sanctimonious pest unworthy of and beneath consideration.



Mike
 

Forum statistieken

Onderwerpen
4.545
Berichten
552.304
Leden
8.668
Nieuwste lid
Joy63
Word vaste donateur van dit forum
Terug
Bovenaan