Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Medusa
Well-known member
Mike
Mike
This feels like a good day to remind everyone that News Media (aka FAKE NEWS) is the enemy of the people.
@AP initially ran with this headline after Trump's brush with death. You can clearly see him bleeding in their photo, yet they deliberately mislead by claiming loud noises. @CNN similarly pushed that Trump "fell" before being rushed off stage.
It doesn't matter that they clarify it later, they knew EXACTLY what they were doing when they ran those headlines.
You've seen it first hand for years now:
PROPAGANDA MEDIA EXISTS TO KEEP YOU IN THE DARK (uninformed of the truth), ANGRY, AND DIVIDED AGAINST EACH OTHER.
It's time to bury these organizations and hold them accountable for creating such an extensive web of lies that it has become an alternate (false) reality.
Mike
@AP initially ran with this headline after Trump's brush with death. You can clearly see him bleeding in their photo, yet they deliberately mislead by claiming loud noises. @CNN similarly pushed that Trump "fell" before being rushed off stage.
It doesn't matter that they clarify it later, they knew EXACTLY what they were doing when they ran those headlines.
You've seen it first hand for years now:
PROPAGANDA MEDIA EXISTS TO KEEP YOU IN THE DARK (uninformed of the truth), ANGRY, AND DIVIDED AGAINST EACH OTHER.
It's time to bury these organizations and hold them accountable for creating such an extensive web of lies that it has become an alternate (false) reality.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
This is a lazy piece of journalism filled with omissions and sleights of hand that create the impression that sexual assault occurred on October 7 on a wide scale, but that investigators have been stymied by factors beyond their control in their quest for actual evidence. The article also contains some revealing errors.
Gessen cites the Pramila Patten report without informing readers that Patten repeatedly emphasized that her mission was not a formal investigation. They later write that the Israeli tale of a "woman who supposedly had a number of nails driven into her vagina" was "not corroborated." In fact, Patten has explicitly stated this claim was not just uncorroborated, but untrue. x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
Gessen goes on to write that Patten's team struggled to find evidence because "survivors and eyewitnesses [to supposed sexual assault on October 7] were reticent." This statement is also disproven by the Patten report, which stated that the Israeli government refused to provide their team with any access to supposed survivors. x.com/muhammadshehad…
Reticence implies that survivors do exist, but that they've been reluctant to speak out of shame. Yet nine months since the October 7 attack, no one has managed to interview a self-proclaimed survivor of rape on October 7, because none exist. The New York Times sent a reporter, Anat Schwartz, to every rape crisis center in Israel to locate an October 7 sexual assault survivor, and she turned up nothing. Schwartz co-bylined the Times' disastrous and comprehensively debunked "Screams Without Words" article alleging "systematic" rape by Hamas, and was subsequently fired for her unprofessional conduct. Gessen, who is joining the NY Times as a columnist, whitewashes that article as merely "controversial."
While interviewing a cast of liberal Zionist NGO feminists operating near the top of Israel's colonial hierarchy, Gessen denigrates "Palestinian activists and pro-Palestinian media, including several U.S.-based outlets," accusing these unnamed elements of "a campaign of denial." Perhaps if Gessen had interviewed critics of the official Israeli propaganda line, or at least read their work, they might have avoided so many embarrassing flubs.
Mike
Gessen cites the Pramila Patten report without informing readers that Patten repeatedly emphasized that her mission was not a formal investigation. They later write that the Israeli tale of a "woman who supposedly had a number of nails driven into her vagina" was "not corroborated." In fact, Patten has explicitly stated this claim was not just uncorroborated, but untrue. x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
Gessen goes on to write that Patten's team struggled to find evidence because "survivors and eyewitnesses [to supposed sexual assault on October 7] were reticent." This statement is also disproven by the Patten report, which stated that the Israeli government refused to provide their team with any access to supposed survivors. x.com/muhammadshehad…
Reticence implies that survivors do exist, but that they've been reluctant to speak out of shame. Yet nine months since the October 7 attack, no one has managed to interview a self-proclaimed survivor of rape on October 7, because none exist. The New York Times sent a reporter, Anat Schwartz, to every rape crisis center in Israel to locate an October 7 sexual assault survivor, and she turned up nothing. Schwartz co-bylined the Times' disastrous and comprehensively debunked "Screams Without Words" article alleging "systematic" rape by Hamas, and was subsequently fired for her unprofessional conduct. Gessen, who is joining the NY Times as a columnist, whitewashes that article as merely "controversial."
While interviewing a cast of liberal Zionist NGO feminists operating near the top of Israel's colonial hierarchy, Gessen denigrates "Palestinian activists and pro-Palestinian media, including several U.S.-based outlets," accusing these unnamed elements of "a campaign of denial." Perhaps if Gessen had interviewed critics of the official Israeli propaganda line, or at least read their work, they might have avoided so many embarrassing flubs.
Mike
There's nothing difficult about this issue. As anyone concerned with the available facts has said from the start, the "Hamas sexual violence" claim is a scam aimed at manufacturing support for Israeli mass murder.
That is the only reasonable conclusion to draw when: there is no forensic, physical, or visual evidence of Hamas sexual violence; every purported Israeli "witness" has been caught lying; there are no identified victims, dead or alive; and the Israeli state has a long, ongoing record of fabrications.
@mashagessen is abetting the scam. Revealingly, Masha declares that "Palestinian activists and pro-Palestinian media" who challenge Israel's claims are engaged in a "campaign of denialism." Why? Because they "have endeavored to debunk claims that sexual violence occurred on October 7th."
Got that? If you dare to "endeavor to debunk" Israeli state claims -- i.e., if you do your job as a journalist and try took at the available facts -- then you are engaged in a "campaign of denialism." How a journalist can write those words is beyond me.
Mike
That is the only reasonable conclusion to draw when: there is no forensic, physical, or visual evidence of Hamas sexual violence; every purported Israeli "witness" has been caught lying; there are no identified victims, dead or alive; and the Israeli state has a long, ongoing record of fabrications.
@mashagessen is abetting the scam. Revealingly, Masha declares that "Palestinian activists and pro-Palestinian media" who challenge Israel's claims are engaged in a "campaign of denialism." Why? Because they "have endeavored to debunk claims that sexual violence occurred on October 7th."
Got that? If you dare to "endeavor to debunk" Israeli state claims -- i.e., if you do your job as a journalist and try took at the available facts -- then you are engaged in a "campaign of denialism." How a journalist can write those words is beyond me.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Forum statistieken
