Mike
Nazi World Order
- Onderwerp starter fatsnotbad
- Startdatum
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Waarom nazi-artsen gruwelijke experimenten deden
In Duitse concentratiekampen zetten nazi-artsen al hun ethische en professionele bezwaren opzij om de meest gruwelijke experimenten uit te voeren op gevangenen. Het was een goede manier om carrière te maken, of om wetenschappelijke doorbraken te bereiken. Daan de Leeuw belicht dit lugubere...
www.nemokennislink.nl
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
No, Hitler Was NOT Pro-Palestine
A video has been circulated by Neo Nazis on X about a particular speech "proving" that Hitler was Pro-Palestine.
If you actually read the speech from which the clip is taken, you see that the Hitlerites are lying (as always).
This soundbite is from Hitler's address to the Reichstag on April 28th, 1939, in response to a letter from US president Roosevelt urging Hitler to avoid military aggression in Europe. 4 months later, he would invade Poland.
That night in April, Hitler gave a 2.5 hour long speech in response to the letter, ridiculing Rooselvelt, justifying the need for Germany colonial expansion, and Jewish extermination.
The part where he (briefly) mentions Palestine was thus not to defend Palestinians, but to condemn the British for their own hypocrisy in allowing some European countries to have colonies and others not. The reference to Palestine was THREE SENTENCES LONG in a speech that lasted almost three hours. This single reference to Palestine was clearly more of a defense in Germany's claim to colonial conquest of Europe, than a defense of Palestinians.
Furthermore, if Hitler truly cared about Palestine, why did he agree to the Zionist Labor Party’s "Haavara Aggrement, transfering 50,000 German Jews to the Holy Land?
The Hitlerites have yet to answer this question, and I suspect they never will.
Mike
A video has been circulated by Neo Nazis on X about a particular speech "proving" that Hitler was Pro-Palestine.
If you actually read the speech from which the clip is taken, you see that the Hitlerites are lying (as always).
This soundbite is from Hitler's address to the Reichstag on April 28th, 1939, in response to a letter from US president Roosevelt urging Hitler to avoid military aggression in Europe. 4 months later, he would invade Poland.
That night in April, Hitler gave a 2.5 hour long speech in response to the letter, ridiculing Rooselvelt, justifying the need for Germany colonial expansion, and Jewish extermination.
The part where he (briefly) mentions Palestine was thus not to defend Palestinians, but to condemn the British for their own hypocrisy in allowing some European countries to have colonies and others not. The reference to Palestine was THREE SENTENCES LONG in a speech that lasted almost three hours. This single reference to Palestine was clearly more of a defense in Germany's claim to colonial conquest of Europe, than a defense of Palestinians.
Furthermore, if Hitler truly cared about Palestine, why did he agree to the Zionist Labor Party’s "Haavara Aggrement, transfering 50,000 German Jews to the Holy Land?
The Hitlerites have yet to answer this question, and I suspect they never will.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Forum statistieken
