Jemig Watisgezond, wat een goed filmpje! Allemaal erg waar wat die man zegt. Ik ben wel heel drastisch gestopt, en zal nooit weten of het op andere, langzamere wijze beter voor me was geweest. Het is in ieder geval allemaal rotzooi en het zou fijn zijn als er eens wat meer tijd en geld werd besteed aan gezondheid in plaats van dat de farmacie alsmaar verdient en de patiënten slachtoffer zijn.
Psychiatrie als dwangmiddel
- Onderwerp starter ruud
- Startdatum
In het Amerikaanse Senaat-rapport over martelprakrijken van de CIA komen telkens dezelfde twee 'psychologen' voor, die oneindige creativiteit aan de dag legden voor het martelen en vernederen van gevangenen:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ivation-dismiss-Senate-report-load-hooey.html
Tyrannie en psychiatrie gaan altijd samen.
Mike
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ivation-dismiss-Senate-report-load-hooey.html
Tyrannie en psychiatrie gaan altijd samen.
Mike
Ik was dus laatst op gesprek met mijn broertje bij het Ggz. Die arts psychiater was dus van plan om zijn huidige medicatie op te hogen.hij slikt nu dus haldol ofzo maar bijna de maximale dosis. Ze willen er nog een middel naast geven maar die zou weer voor bepaalde spierkrampen kunnen zorgen. Echt vreselijk wat een troep het allemaal is. En bijna alle klassieke medicatie die er is heeft hij gehad maar ze doen geen van allen wat ze moeten doen.
Die arts vond dat mijn broertje aan de clozapine moest maar dan moet hij elke week bloedprikken en hij heeft dus een fobie voor bloed afnemen. Dat gaat het ook niet worden. Hij kwam zelfs ook nog met electro shocken ofzo nou dat wil hij al helemaal niet!
Ben bang dat het echt uitzichtloos is, op deze manier zijn toekomst voortzetten en zo jong nog ook.
Die arts vond dat mijn broertje aan de clozapine moest maar dan moet hij elke week bloedprikken en hij heeft dus een fobie voor bloed afnemen. Dat gaat het ook niet worden. Hij kwam zelfs ook nog met electro shocken ofzo nou dat wil hij al helemaal niet!
Ben bang dat het echt uitzichtloos is, op deze manier zijn toekomst voortzetten en zo jong nog ook.
Jemig, wat vreselijk Sampjes.
Kan hij sowieso niet met al die troep stoppen?
Mentale problemen kunnen komen door zware metalen in de hersenen. Heeft hij amalgaamvullingen (gehad) of staat hij op een andere manier bloot aan zware metalen dat jij weet?
Hier een aantal symptomen die verband kunnen houden met kwikvergiftiging:
http://www.noamalgam.com/#diseases
Kan hij sowieso niet met al die troep stoppen?
Mentale problemen kunnen komen door zware metalen in de hersenen. Heeft hij amalgaamvullingen (gehad) of staat hij op een andere manier bloot aan zware metalen dat jij weet?
Hier een aantal symptomen die verband kunnen houden met kwikvergiftiging:
http://www.noamalgam.com/#diseases
Dit sluit aan bij m'n vorige bericht (lees ik net in Amalgam Illness van Dr. Cutler):
Quote:
Due to the great number of potential sources of occult mercury exposure, anyone with psychiatric or neurological problems which are not responding to treatment, or which are generally considered to have a poor outcome (prognosis) is a legitimate candidate for a lipoic acid/DMSA therapeutic trial.
Mark
Quote:
Due to the great number of potential sources of occult mercury exposure, anyone with psychiatric or neurological problems which are not responding to treatment, or which are generally considered to have a poor outcome (prognosis) is a legitimate candidate for a lipoic acid/DMSA therapeutic trial.
Mark
Veel mensen in het westen zijn in hun jeugd narcistisch gekrenkt: logisch dat veel mensen vervolgens narcistische trekken krijgen. Dit is een overlevingsmechanisme en het is dan ook nodig zolang mensen het idee hebben dat ze nog in een overlevingsmodus moeten leven.
Zie bijv. dit: http://www.nu.nl/wetenschap/3932212/opwekken-van-narcistisch-gevoel-verhoogt-creativiteit.html via http://www.leefbewust.com/2014/nieuws/211114.html
Zie bijv. dit: http://www.nu.nl/wetenschap/3932212/opwekken-van-narcistisch-gevoel-verhoogt-creativiteit.html via http://www.leefbewust.com/2014/nieuws/211114.html
Psychiatrie en tyrannie gaan hand in hand en dat is nog steeds zo:
http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/only-the-sheeple-are-sane-it-s-official-if-you-question-authority
Mike
http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/only-the-sheeple-are-sane-it-s-official-if-you-question-authority
Mike
Stefan Molyneux over ODD (Oppositional Defiance Disorder):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featu...3534&v=eOScYBwMyAA&x-yt-ts=1421914688
Quote:
But all of you have Oppositional Defiant Disorder!
So, here are 12 symptoms of ODD:
- The person often loses control of his temper;
- The person behaves aggressively/assertively;
- The person argues with his parental authorities and other adults and does not obey them;
- The person deliberately irritates others;
- The person is apathetic or cannot play with others;
- The person with oppositional defiant disorder is often angry or nervous;
- The person refuses to comply with the rules (in context or in environment/situation);
- The person is too stubborn;
- The person often occur hysterical attacks or outbursts;
- The person with oppositional defiant disorder cannot communicate normally with other compliant peers;
- The person does not want to comply or engage in other organized/expected activities;
- The person with oppositional defiant disorder symptoms remembers the hurt for a long time and does not forget about them.
Ik ben niet meer te redden!
Mike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featu...3534&v=eOScYBwMyAA&x-yt-ts=1421914688
Quote:
But all of you have Oppositional Defiant Disorder!
So, here are 12 symptoms of ODD:
- The person often loses control of his temper;
- The person behaves aggressively/assertively;
- The person argues with his parental authorities and other adults and does not obey them;
- The person deliberately irritates others;
- The person is apathetic or cannot play with others;
- The person with oppositional defiant disorder is often angry or nervous;
- The person refuses to comply with the rules (in context or in environment/situation);
- The person is too stubborn;
- The person often occur hysterical attacks or outbursts;
- The person with oppositional defiant disorder cannot communicate normally with other compliant peers;
- The person does not want to comply or engage in other organized/expected activities;
- The person with oppositional defiant disorder symptoms remembers the hurt for a long time and does not forget about them.
Ik ben niet meer te redden!
Mike
Dr Paula Caplan over hoe psyche-haters bepalen of jij wel normaal bent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-...-yt-ts=1421914688&feature=player_embedded
Mike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-...-yt-ts=1421914688&feature=player_embedded
Mike
G
Guest
Guest
Of het nou echt in deze topic hoort..
Maar wil het wel even delen met jullie. Ik was bij de diëtiste in het AMC ivm ondergewicht en moest 3 dagen mijn eetpatroon noteren. Het dus alles opgeschreven en met haar besproken. Alles heel eerlijk op tafel 'gelegd' en tot mijn verbazing zei ze: "Kijk eindelijk iemand die het snapt."
Ik stond even met m'n mond vol tanden kan ik jullie vertellen!
Maar wil het wel even delen met jullie. Ik was bij de diëtiste in het AMC ivm ondergewicht en moest 3 dagen mijn eetpatroon noteren. Het dus alles opgeschreven en met haar besproken. Alles heel eerlijk op tafel 'gelegd' en tot mijn verbazing zei ze: "Kijk eindelijk iemand die het snapt."
Ik stond even met m'n mond vol tanden kan ik jullie vertellen!
Dat maak je nog niet vaak mee...
Lees deze twee recensies die in de nieuwste editie van Wise Traditions staan:
http://www.westonaprice.org/book-reviews/mad-in-america-by-robert-whitaker/
http://www.westonaprice.org/book-reviews/anatomy-of-an-epidemic-by-robert-whitaker/
Voor de critici die vinden dat ik teveel aan politiek doe hier op het forum. Lees dit uit de eerste recensie:
Yet, despite the inhumanity of these early procedures, the “darkest era in the treatment of the mentally ill” was the period between 1900 and 1950. The eugenics movement arising in the late 1800s set the stage for the development of further inhumane psychiatric treatments. Eugenics proponents judged the mentally ill as “societal wastage” and the product of a “defective germ plasm.” The advocates of eugenics determined that mental illness is inherited and the end stage of a progressive decline in a family line. A “neuropathy gene,” dubbed the “insanity gene,” was a recessive gene that caused mental illness. A “normal” person could also be a carrier of such a gene. The theory of “tainted genes,” popularized by Aaron Rosanoff, MD, who conducted a medical study on the topic, became a medical paradigm published in The Science of Eugenics.
Thus, the only solution to stop the spread of mental illness, according to the eugenicists, was sterilization. This country’s lawmakers agreed and as a consequence gave the U.S. the first laws for the compulsory sterilization of the mentally ill. In 1907 Indiana was the first state to pass the mandatory sterilization law followed by thirty other states. In 1914 Connecticut prohibited the mentally ill from marrying. In 1927 the U.S. Supreme Court, led by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, in Buck v. Bell, ruled that these laws were indeed constitutional. After that ruling forced sterilizations increased by 66 percent. Doctors claimed that it had a therapeutic benefit; the sperm was conserved and the operation led to an improvement in mental health. Soon it was considered a “medical treatment” for the mentally ill.
The National Eugenics Conference of 1914 was funded by John Harvey Kellogg, the inventor of the boxed cold cereals. The Second International Conference on Eugenics in 1921 was financed by Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, with speakers from prestigious universities taking their turn at the lectern discussing topics such as “The Jewish Problem” and the public cost of caring for defectives. In the same year some forty-four colleges introduced eugenics into their curricula and taught the courses as a bona fide science. Academics at Harvard, Yale, MIT, Columbia and other prestigious colleges researched and published articles on the subject in The Journal of Heredity. Eugenics dogma flowed into the American school system.
Rockefeller money contributed cash prizes to clergymen who delivered the best sermon on eugenics. The Reverend William Matson won with his sermon when he declared, “We may raise the pig in the parlor, but he is still a pig.” In 1928 Rockefeller gave two and one-half million dollars to the Psychiatric Institute in Munich, Germany for “eugenics research.” Alexis Carrel, a medical doctor who won a Nobel Prize for his work at the Rockefeller Institute, proposed in 1935 that society “dispose of criminals and the insane in small euthanasia institutes with proper gases.”
Grounded in pervasive hatred, pedantry, prejudice, hubris and fear, treatments for the mentally ill reached their lowest and most debased levels. From the 1920s to mid-1950s the use of the insulin coma became a common treatment for schizophrenia. The coma caused hemorrhages in the brain and destroyed nerve tissues. The next popular treatment was metrazol shock injections which produced “explosive” seizures in which the “patient would arch into a convulsion so severe that it would break bones, cause spinal fractures and loosen teeth.” The procedure was used in 70 percent of U.S. hospitals by 1939. But the worst was yet to come.
The following lines are a summary of general instructions on how to perform a quick lobotomy from the medical textbook, Psychosurgery (1950) written by Walter Freeman and James Watts, the most well-known advocates and performers of lobotomy, which was a procedure commonly performed on the mentally ill in the 1940s and 1950s:
Instead of drilling holes in the sides of the patient’s head, Freeman attacked the frontal lobes through the eye sockets. He would use an ice pick to poke a hole above each eye, insert it seven centimeters deep, then move behind the patient’s head and pull up on the ice pick to destroy the frontal lobe nerve fibers. To quicken the process, he would drive picks into both eyes at once and then step behind the patient and pull up on both icepicks at the same time. Instead of anesthesia he would knock patients out with electroshock beforehand which “saved time.” He dispensed with the use of any sterile precautions (p 133-134).
Antonio Egas Moniz, the psychiatrist who originated the lobotomy procedure and shared a Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1949, claimed that emotional disorders became fixed in the frontal lobes and destruction of the cellular connections would cure patients. After many surgeries he determined that lobotomy failed in the case of schizophrenia, but Freeman reported that they could indeed be helped by the procedure.
Freeman performed the procedure, which took from ten to twenty minutes, at state mental hospitals and on an outpatient basis hundreds of times, perhaps thousands. One of Freeman’s youngest patients, Howard Dully, was lobotomized at age twelve. His parents considered him a difficult child and handed him over to Freeman’s quick icepick. Dully documented his experiences in his book My Lobotomy.
In the 1950s state mental hospitals were gradually dismantled due to the crippling costs to state budgets, and a large captive group of patients were no longer available for such procedures. Lobotomy was gradually abandoned around the same time, after reports of similar surgeries in Nazi Germany revolted and shocked the American general public.
After lobotomy, electroshock therapy (ECT) was one of the most cruel and disabling treatments doled out by medical professionals of the last century. It continues to be used today despite its abysmal failure rate at relieving mental illness, especially depression.
In the recent film, Blue Jasmine, Cate Blanchett, whose character is named Jasmine, talks about receiving a dose of “Edison’s medicine” because she was depressed. A recent episode of the television series Royal Pains showed Dr. Hank recommending ECT to a troubled housewife and her total recovery afterwards.
ECT was invented by an Italian psychiatrist who first experimented on vagrants. It was introduced into the U.S. in the 1940s. Electrodes were placed at the patient’s temples, which induced spasms accompanied by memory loss, reduced cognitive function and permanent impairment of learning capacity. The procedure was repeated many times on the same patient “to induce therapeutic confusion,” which would somehow cure the patient. Patients often became incontinent and walked around naked. Children were also subjected to shock therapy. In an experiment on twenty children who were shocked twice per day for twenty days, many later became extremely violent and disturbed.
Patients who received the therapy speak of the extreme pain it caused: the broken bones and shattered teeth. Those who tried to escape were dragged screaming into the treatment room. Most patients, once shocked, became so difficult to manage when they heard about another pending treatment that psychiatrists began to shock them without their consent. The opinion of the American “electroshock doctors” was that they had the right to act in the patient’s best interest, even over his or her screaming protests.
ECT was a common practice for two decades to frighten, control, and punish difficult patients in state facilities. To quiet wards, doctors and nurses set up a schedule for shocking rows of patients, going up and down the aisle with the equipment. Nurses at one Georgia asylum regularly threatened difficult patients with “a Georgia power cocktail.”
The Rockefeller Institute is at least partially responsible for the rise of psychiatry in America. It provided sixteen million dollars over twenty years to develop new techniques and new departments of psychiatry and neurosurgery at medical schools and for the experiments which led to the development of lobotomy and electroshock.
Even though psychiatrists knew the outcomes of electroshock and realized that the treatment caused permanent brain damage and disability, the procedure became commonplace. Whitaker states that these gruesome and inhuman treatments survived and were practiced by so many professionals because of the “storytelling partnership.” One doctor told the story in a medical journal and at medical conferences that his treatment was successful. This story was told by another doctor, then another. With time, the treatment was discussed in major newspapers as the treatment of the hour. Doctors practicing these “therapies” became famous and rich.
Before lobotomy, asylum medicine and asylum doctors were considered the lowest on the medical totem pole. After the bells and whistles of lobotomy and electroshock, psychiatrists took over the treatment of the mentally ill.
After reading this book, one cannot help but be deeply moved. Readers may question how such treatments were sanctioned and performed, not once, but thousands of times, on innocent, ill people. How could we in 2014 not judge the treatments of the mentally ill in the past as contrivances of those who were mad themselves? Genuine Bedlam.
Remember, the worst practices were occurring when Dr. Price wrote Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, in which he bravely argued that mental illness was not the result of genetics but of poor nutrition. When, oh when, will the psychiatrists realize that people who are mad are people whose brains are starving?
Zeg mij maar eens waar voeding begint en politiek eindigt. Als we niet de duistere agenda's achter deze waanzin blootleggen, krabben we slechts aan het oppervlak! De WAPF zelf doet er niet moeilijk over om hierover te schrijven, dus waarom zou dat hier wel een probleem zijn?
Mike
http://www.westonaprice.org/book-reviews/mad-in-america-by-robert-whitaker/
http://www.westonaprice.org/book-reviews/anatomy-of-an-epidemic-by-robert-whitaker/
Voor de critici die vinden dat ik teveel aan politiek doe hier op het forum. Lees dit uit de eerste recensie:
Yet, despite the inhumanity of these early procedures, the “darkest era in the treatment of the mentally ill” was the period between 1900 and 1950. The eugenics movement arising in the late 1800s set the stage for the development of further inhumane psychiatric treatments. Eugenics proponents judged the mentally ill as “societal wastage” and the product of a “defective germ plasm.” The advocates of eugenics determined that mental illness is inherited and the end stage of a progressive decline in a family line. A “neuropathy gene,” dubbed the “insanity gene,” was a recessive gene that caused mental illness. A “normal” person could also be a carrier of such a gene. The theory of “tainted genes,” popularized by Aaron Rosanoff, MD, who conducted a medical study on the topic, became a medical paradigm published in The Science of Eugenics.
Thus, the only solution to stop the spread of mental illness, according to the eugenicists, was sterilization. This country’s lawmakers agreed and as a consequence gave the U.S. the first laws for the compulsory sterilization of the mentally ill. In 1907 Indiana was the first state to pass the mandatory sterilization law followed by thirty other states. In 1914 Connecticut prohibited the mentally ill from marrying. In 1927 the U.S. Supreme Court, led by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, in Buck v. Bell, ruled that these laws were indeed constitutional. After that ruling forced sterilizations increased by 66 percent. Doctors claimed that it had a therapeutic benefit; the sperm was conserved and the operation led to an improvement in mental health. Soon it was considered a “medical treatment” for the mentally ill.
The National Eugenics Conference of 1914 was funded by John Harvey Kellogg, the inventor of the boxed cold cereals. The Second International Conference on Eugenics in 1921 was financed by Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, with speakers from prestigious universities taking their turn at the lectern discussing topics such as “The Jewish Problem” and the public cost of caring for defectives. In the same year some forty-four colleges introduced eugenics into their curricula and taught the courses as a bona fide science. Academics at Harvard, Yale, MIT, Columbia and other prestigious colleges researched and published articles on the subject in The Journal of Heredity. Eugenics dogma flowed into the American school system.
Rockefeller money contributed cash prizes to clergymen who delivered the best sermon on eugenics. The Reverend William Matson won with his sermon when he declared, “We may raise the pig in the parlor, but he is still a pig.” In 1928 Rockefeller gave two and one-half million dollars to the Psychiatric Institute in Munich, Germany for “eugenics research.” Alexis Carrel, a medical doctor who won a Nobel Prize for his work at the Rockefeller Institute, proposed in 1935 that society “dispose of criminals and the insane in small euthanasia institutes with proper gases.”
Grounded in pervasive hatred, pedantry, prejudice, hubris and fear, treatments for the mentally ill reached their lowest and most debased levels. From the 1920s to mid-1950s the use of the insulin coma became a common treatment for schizophrenia. The coma caused hemorrhages in the brain and destroyed nerve tissues. The next popular treatment was metrazol shock injections which produced “explosive” seizures in which the “patient would arch into a convulsion so severe that it would break bones, cause spinal fractures and loosen teeth.” The procedure was used in 70 percent of U.S. hospitals by 1939. But the worst was yet to come.
The following lines are a summary of general instructions on how to perform a quick lobotomy from the medical textbook, Psychosurgery (1950) written by Walter Freeman and James Watts, the most well-known advocates and performers of lobotomy, which was a procedure commonly performed on the mentally ill in the 1940s and 1950s:
Instead of drilling holes in the sides of the patient’s head, Freeman attacked the frontal lobes through the eye sockets. He would use an ice pick to poke a hole above each eye, insert it seven centimeters deep, then move behind the patient’s head and pull up on the ice pick to destroy the frontal lobe nerve fibers. To quicken the process, he would drive picks into both eyes at once and then step behind the patient and pull up on both icepicks at the same time. Instead of anesthesia he would knock patients out with electroshock beforehand which “saved time.” He dispensed with the use of any sterile precautions (p 133-134).
Antonio Egas Moniz, the psychiatrist who originated the lobotomy procedure and shared a Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1949, claimed that emotional disorders became fixed in the frontal lobes and destruction of the cellular connections would cure patients. After many surgeries he determined that lobotomy failed in the case of schizophrenia, but Freeman reported that they could indeed be helped by the procedure.
Freeman performed the procedure, which took from ten to twenty minutes, at state mental hospitals and on an outpatient basis hundreds of times, perhaps thousands. One of Freeman’s youngest patients, Howard Dully, was lobotomized at age twelve. His parents considered him a difficult child and handed him over to Freeman’s quick icepick. Dully documented his experiences in his book My Lobotomy.
In the 1950s state mental hospitals were gradually dismantled due to the crippling costs to state budgets, and a large captive group of patients were no longer available for such procedures. Lobotomy was gradually abandoned around the same time, after reports of similar surgeries in Nazi Germany revolted and shocked the American general public.
After lobotomy, electroshock therapy (ECT) was one of the most cruel and disabling treatments doled out by medical professionals of the last century. It continues to be used today despite its abysmal failure rate at relieving mental illness, especially depression.
In the recent film, Blue Jasmine, Cate Blanchett, whose character is named Jasmine, talks about receiving a dose of “Edison’s medicine” because she was depressed. A recent episode of the television series Royal Pains showed Dr. Hank recommending ECT to a troubled housewife and her total recovery afterwards.
ECT was invented by an Italian psychiatrist who first experimented on vagrants. It was introduced into the U.S. in the 1940s. Electrodes were placed at the patient’s temples, which induced spasms accompanied by memory loss, reduced cognitive function and permanent impairment of learning capacity. The procedure was repeated many times on the same patient “to induce therapeutic confusion,” which would somehow cure the patient. Patients often became incontinent and walked around naked. Children were also subjected to shock therapy. In an experiment on twenty children who were shocked twice per day for twenty days, many later became extremely violent and disturbed.
Patients who received the therapy speak of the extreme pain it caused: the broken bones and shattered teeth. Those who tried to escape were dragged screaming into the treatment room. Most patients, once shocked, became so difficult to manage when they heard about another pending treatment that psychiatrists began to shock them without their consent. The opinion of the American “electroshock doctors” was that they had the right to act in the patient’s best interest, even over his or her screaming protests.
ECT was a common practice for two decades to frighten, control, and punish difficult patients in state facilities. To quiet wards, doctors and nurses set up a schedule for shocking rows of patients, going up and down the aisle with the equipment. Nurses at one Georgia asylum regularly threatened difficult patients with “a Georgia power cocktail.”
The Rockefeller Institute is at least partially responsible for the rise of psychiatry in America. It provided sixteen million dollars over twenty years to develop new techniques and new departments of psychiatry and neurosurgery at medical schools and for the experiments which led to the development of lobotomy and electroshock.
Even though psychiatrists knew the outcomes of electroshock and realized that the treatment caused permanent brain damage and disability, the procedure became commonplace. Whitaker states that these gruesome and inhuman treatments survived and were practiced by so many professionals because of the “storytelling partnership.” One doctor told the story in a medical journal and at medical conferences that his treatment was successful. This story was told by another doctor, then another. With time, the treatment was discussed in major newspapers as the treatment of the hour. Doctors practicing these “therapies” became famous and rich.
Before lobotomy, asylum medicine and asylum doctors were considered the lowest on the medical totem pole. After the bells and whistles of lobotomy and electroshock, psychiatrists took over the treatment of the mentally ill.
After reading this book, one cannot help but be deeply moved. Readers may question how such treatments were sanctioned and performed, not once, but thousands of times, on innocent, ill people. How could we in 2014 not judge the treatments of the mentally ill in the past as contrivances of those who were mad themselves? Genuine Bedlam.
Remember, the worst practices were occurring when Dr. Price wrote Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, in which he bravely argued that mental illness was not the result of genetics but of poor nutrition. When, oh when, will the psychiatrists realize that people who are mad are people whose brains are starving?
Zeg mij maar eens waar voeding begint en politiek eindigt. Als we niet de duistere agenda's achter deze waanzin blootleggen, krabben we slechts aan het oppervlak! De WAPF zelf doet er niet moeilijk over om hierover te schrijven, dus waarom zou dat hier wel een probleem zijn?
Mike
Forum statistieken
