The Great Awakening

[fatsnotbad]

So the 25th was the five year anniversary of the Kobe Bryant helicopter crash and next day the Philadelphia Eagles, Kobe was from Philadelphia, posted this meme of a helicopter with a person at the bottom saying "just dropped down to say 'GO BIRDS'" with a timestamp of 2:59 PM EST

At this point it is totally mathematically impossible to be a coincidence!

Check out the Q post associated with this timestamp...

Q 259
RED RED 9/11.
Funds raised vs distributed?
Oversight?
7/10 plane crashes are targeted kills.
Those in the know never sleep.
Q

The Eagles have landed, and the White Hats are in control!

dailymail.co.uk/sport/nba/arti…



Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

So an American *Eagle* traveling from *Kansas* crashes in DC.

Chiefs > Eagles.

It was landing on runway 33 - a well known Satanic Occult number.

Meanwhile, the Eagles put out a weird tweet with a helicopter 3 days ago, and ESPN puts out an article telling us how safe the Super Bowl will be next weekend.

More on the “stay frosty” side with this. But seriously, was this a foreshadowing???

espn.com/nfl/story/_/id…

h/t’s to:
@ripeaustace @Kimberlyrja8 @WeAreWoke1776_3



Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

“Don’t think for yourself or question things from all angles - Just believe what I say because I said so”.

That’s what I hear when I see people preaching about how we should/shouldn’t view the drops.

I find it interesting that some folks are choosing to continually sling shade and sow doubt and division simply because they disagree with someone else’s take/view of the drops.

Which to be fair, isn’t nearly as nauseating as the circle jerk they all partake in while doing so.

I said it before and I’ll say it again: No single Anon is the arbiter of the Q-Drops. People are free to take from them what they wish - and I encourage exactly that.

Or does that whole “the choice to know will be yours” thing just not apply anymore if someone disagrees with you?

I happen to believe a lot of folks claiming to have a 40k ft view are actually cruising somewheres around 10k ft in a Cessna - at the same time, you don’t see me throwing shade at them or telling y’all not to listen to or follow them. That’s high school bullshit and awfully close to gatekeeping.

Anyone telling you what YOU should believe is being disingenuous. Telling others what to think/believe in a free thinking movement is a dangerous proposition.

Even with what I am saying right now - take from it what you will. View the drops how YOU want. Take from them what YOU can. As long as you are waking up, and thinking for yourself … that’s what I care about.

I’m never gonna tell my followers how to think, what to think, or when to think it.

Last I checked, we were all kind of over being told what to believe, or what we should and shouldn’t talk about.

How about you focus on your own content instead of judging and ridiculing others for how they analyze and interpret the drops?

Maybe if more folks did that, so many wouldn’t be behind the curve with current news and comms.



Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[Medusa]

 

[Medusa]

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Update from Catherine Herridge:

TOP LINE: The animus is personal.

Covering last week’s confirmation hearing for Kash Patel, nominated by President Trump to lead the FBI, was a significant test for many reporters who fear and loathe the longtime Trump aide.

Kash Patel’s investigative work undercut the mainstream media narrative about Russia Gate as well as the event timeline leading up to January 6.

As a result, a fair, fact driven assessment of Patel’s performance may be hard to come by.

DEEP DIVE:

I speak from experience.

In 2018, I was among the first reporters to obtain the so-called Nunes memo which was spearheaded by then republican chairman of the House intelligence committee Devin Nunes. The four page memo was drafted by Patel.

The declassified document laid bare significant defects in the FBI and Justice Department surveillance warrant for Carter Page, a Trump campaign aide during the 2016 election. Those defects were later confirmed and amplified in the 2019 DOJ Inspector General Horowitz report.

To simplify, the most senior FBI and Justice Department officials wrongly relied on the Steele Dossier, opposition research largely funded by the Clinton campaign, as well as flawed sub-sources to secure the Page surveillance warrants. Surveilling Page was a window into the communications of the broader Trump campaign which was the ultimate target.

Applications to the highly secretive FISA court (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) also took the unusual step of citing news media reports to strengthen the case for multiple surveillance warrants. A former FBI agent who has personally drafted surveillance warrants told me that in their decades long career, they had never seen a FISA application rely on media reporting.

That matters because Patel’s investigation revealed evidence of “circular reporting.” Here’s how it works: an FBI or other government official leaks information to a reporter, who then publishes the information, and it then comes full circle when the FBI cites the same reporter’s work as evidence to back up their case.

(Attached FISA application)

Pulling back the curtain on circular reporting undercuts the credibility of some journalists who raised their profiles through Russia Gate “scoops” from anonymous ‘law enforcement officials’ or ‘sources familiar with the matter.’

For other journalists, Patel’s second strike was his first hand account of requests for DoD support prior to January 6, specifically National Guard troops. One of the big moments at the confirmation hearing came when GOP Senator Ted Cruz pinned down Patel on the alleged actions of then-House Speaker Pelosi.

In February 2021, I obtained the internal DoD timeline for security requests from Washington D.C.’s mayor, Capitol Hill police and others. The timeline states that before January 6 “DoD confirmed with U.S Capitol Police (USCP) there is no request for DoD support" and the DC Mayor requested limited Guard forces for "Traffic Control Points" and "Metro Station support."

I also know from personal experience that to stray from the mainstream January 6 narrative was like touching a third rail. Because I was asking legitimate and basic questions about the US Attorney's strategy, and showed curiosity about the timeline, I felt a target on my back.

I also reported on internal law enforcement records about weapons brought to the Capitol on January 6 and the violent fallout. Those reports drew no scrutiny among my CBS News colleagues.

You may be hard pressed to find stories about Patel’s confirmation that don’t include “controversial choice” or “grilling.” That because all roads lead back to Patel’s memos, and the DoD January 6 timeline.

To borrow a phrase, buckle up, because the new Trump-appointed CIA Director John Ratcliffe is positioned to declassify more Russia Gate records as well as CIA related correspondence about the Hunter Biden laptop.



Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Mike