Hier een zeer goed artikel van het Mises Institute (genoemd naar Ludwig von Mises, de vader van de Oostenrijkse economische school van de Libertariers) over wat er niet deugt aan 'sociaal anarchisme':
https://mises.org/library/trouble-socialist-anarchism
Indeed, anarcho-capitalism has always been considered an oxymoron by the self-proclaimed "true" anarchists.
(...)
A deeper and more interesting reason is anarchism's socialist roots. As shown in, e.g., the Anarchist FAQ, most — if not all — historical anarchist thinkers were proud to announce their ideas belonged to the progressive socialist tradition. The "founding father" of anarchism, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, was socialist; American 19th century individualist anarchists often claimed to be socialists; and the Russian communist anarchists Mikhail Bakunin and Peter Kropotkin were obviously socialists.
(...)
We can support the socialist anarchist goal to abolish the state as an inherently evil institution forcing individuals to relinquish that which is theirs by natural right. But we also see the shortcomings of socialism as currently defined; time preference is a fundamental piece of information on how people, and therefore the market and society, function.
Mike
https://mises.org/library/trouble-socialist-anarchism
Indeed, anarcho-capitalism has always been considered an oxymoron by the self-proclaimed "true" anarchists.
(...)
A deeper and more interesting reason is anarchism's socialist roots. As shown in, e.g., the Anarchist FAQ, most — if not all — historical anarchist thinkers were proud to announce their ideas belonged to the progressive socialist tradition. The "founding father" of anarchism, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, was socialist; American 19th century individualist anarchists often claimed to be socialists; and the Russian communist anarchists Mikhail Bakunin and Peter Kropotkin were obviously socialists.
(...)
We can support the socialist anarchist goal to abolish the state as an inherently evil institution forcing individuals to relinquish that which is theirs by natural right. But we also see the shortcomings of socialism as currently defined; time preference is a fundamental piece of information on how people, and therefore the market and society, function.
Mike
