Goede analyse van de brief die 100 vrouwen in Frankrijk onder aanvoering van Catharine Deneuve schreven in protest tegen de #MeToo-hype:
http://www.returnofkings.com/149075...for-trying-to-tell-women-the-truth-about-rape
Deze twee citaten sprongen er voor mij uit:
Far from being a pillar of virtue, Catherine could nonetheless be genuine in her defense of men (which would be worthy of praise), but I make a point of never listening to what women say; instead, I observe what they do.
She might be warning the new generation of women not to sink their own boats by attacking the permanent victimhood of modern feminists, showing them how they should be more realistic about the realities of the sexual marketplace and use the system in a clever manner instead of seeking to destroy it all.
That letter would translate to, “My fellow promiscuous women, don’t reject male attention. You love it, I loved it, everyone knows it. Use it to your advantage, instead.”
It is essentially a battle between former beautiful women who are ready to sacrifice to keep the attention and money flowing (no one accused Weinstein until the roles stopped coming), and ugly women inventing stalkers and rapists for themselves because they’ve hardly ever felt the embrace of a man, let alone a desirable one.
We are facing a textbook example of the sour grapes phenomenon where washed up carousel riders with too much time on their hands and grossly unattractive women who were never given any attention try to take their revenge on the more fortunate, all out of sheer jealousy.
In their land of make believe, those ugly root vegetables compensate for absent masculine attention by another type of attention created by the “rape survivor card.” They call for the neutering and death of men so that attractive women feel their misery by being deprived of actual male attention. “If I am not happy, why should you be?”
Mike
