Colloquial
Well-known member
Neemt het vertrouwen in Trump juist niet toe onder normies?
Trump
- Onderwerp starter 100leven
- Startdatum
Colloquial
Well-known member
Veel Trump stemmers van de afgelopen verkiezingen hebben moeite met zijn vaccinatie standpunt, en ook meer en meer met Israël. Dat is helder. Maar voormalig Biden stemmers en mensen die niet veel om politiek geven zien toch steeds beter hoe het leven onder Trump was?
Ik heb de vinger niet aan de pols van normies, niet in NL en niet in USA of waar dan ook. Mij valt op dat steeds meer 'wakkeren' vragen stellen bij Trump. Ook bij Q trouwens. Het is allemaal demotivatie, niet durven geloven. Trump moet het echter niet van deze relatief kleine groep hebben, maar juist van de normies. Hij zal dus wel weten wat hij doet.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF TRUMP IN ELECTION INTERFERENCE CASE
In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has granted Donald Trump immunity from prosecution in the federal case concerning election interference.
This ruling effectively nullifies the four-count indictment brought by special counsel Jack Smith.
The Court's majority opinion asserts that a former president cannot face criminal charges for actions taken during official duties unless first impeached and convicted by Congress.
This decision marks a significant precedent for the scope of executive power and presidential accountability.
The ruling is a significant win for Trump's legal team and a setback for the prosecution.
It implies that the federal case linked to the 2020 election and the events of January 6th will not move forward, which could affect Trump's other ongoing legal battles.
This decision may have broad implications for the 2024 presidential race and the future framework of presidential accountability in the U.S.
Mike
In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has granted Donald Trump immunity from prosecution in the federal case concerning election interference.
This ruling effectively nullifies the four-count indictment brought by special counsel Jack Smith.
The Court's majority opinion asserts that a former president cannot face criminal charges for actions taken during official duties unless first impeached and convicted by Congress.
This decision marks a significant precedent for the scope of executive power and presidential accountability.
The ruling is a significant win for Trump's legal team and a setback for the prosecution.
It implies that the federal case linked to the 2020 election and the events of January 6th will not move forward, which could affect Trump's other ongoing legal battles.
This decision may have broad implications for the 2024 presidential race and the future framework of presidential accountability in the U.S.
Mike
Godsgeschenk
Well-known member
Heel goed.
Maar dan kunnen Obama, Biden etc. ook niet strafrechtelijk vervolgd worden... En dat is wel weer jammer.
Dorothé
Mike
Medusa
Well-known member
Mike
Mike
Colloquial
Well-known member
Mike
Mike
Forum statistieken
